I’m sure music critics usually do reviews on newer music (relevance and all that) but you can do a review on any album. It doesn’t matter if it was released in the 40s or a week ago. For example, there are music blogs where the person will do a review on an album they listened to, usually to either convince people to listen to it, or convince them not to. Depending on the aim of the blog, the album could have been anything from some obscure 80s Latin album to 50 Cent’s newest release.

3 Responses

1. Hannah Says:
   December 26th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

   they can be both.
   References :

2. Vicky Says:
   December 26th, 2009 at 1:36 pm

   I’m sure music critics usually do reviews on newer music (relevance and all that) but you can do a review on any album. It doesn’t matter if it was released in the 40s or a week ago. For example, there are music blogs where the person will do a review on an album they listened to, usually to either convince people to listen to it, or convince them not to. Depending on the aim of the blog, the album could have been anything from some obscure 80s Latin album to 50 Cent’s newest release.
   References :

3. Shades of Grey♥ Says:
   December 26th, 2009 at 2:17 pm

   I generally write reviews of something that I’ve just discovered, and it’s usually something new… altho I can’t think of a reason why someone shouldn’t write a review of something old ~ or that is new to *them*.

   Strange question. Why do you ask?
   References :

Leave a Comment